Tag Archives: huatulco

November in Huatulco

By Britt Jarnryd—

By November, Huatulco is beginning to welcome back its winter visitors. Restaurants and beaches are getting busier, familiar faces are returning, and the town is settling into another season.

But at El Sueño Zapoteco/A.C. Bacaanda Foundation, our work continues year-round.

The beginning of the school year in August and September is always our busiest period. We welcome and train new community educators participating in our Smart Rural School program. Hundreds of iPads must be cleaned, updated and programmed. Equipment and internet connectivity are checked, and teachers receive training in technology and our Spanish, mathematics, reading and writing programs.

By November, the school year is well underway, and our focus shifts to supporting educators in their classrooms. Our team continues to visit rural communities, some more than three hours from Huatulco, providing teacher training and educational guidance. We also meet with parents because their involvement is essential to their children’s education.

Our Continuing My Dream scholarship program is also in full swing. This year, we are supporting 26 students from rural communities as they pursue their high school education. Each receives financial assistance for enrollment, uniforms, shoes, school supplies, an iPad, transportation and meals.

Beyond this practical support, students receive mentoring in mathematics, English, study habits, emotional and social development, community projects and spelling. Our goal is to help them develop the skills and confidence they need to navigate both academic and personal challenges.

Alongside our educational programs, we continue organizing fundraising events, welcoming volunteers and donors, and developing new projects.

While Huatulco prepares for another busy tourist season, we remain focused on ensuring that growing up in a rural community does not limit a child’s opportunities to learn, grow and build a better future.

But we cannot build this dream alone. Every donation, every volunteer and every person who shares our mission helps us reach more children and young people.

To those who have supported us over the years, thank you for walking alongside us. And to everyone returning to Huatulco this season, we welcome you back with open arms and a special invitation: come and be part of this dream.

Before It Was Art: Objects From Copalita

By Randy Jackson—

Around the turn of the twelfth century AD, the Mixtec conqueror 8 Deer Jaguar Claw demanded tribute from a town at the mouth of the Copalita River, the place now known as the Copalita archaeological site (Parque Eco-Arqueológico Copalita). We know this because a highly skilled Mixtec artisan painted the conqueror’s story on a long strip of deerskin. That brightly coloured ‘book’, now called the Codex Zouche-Nuttall, is housed in the British Museum, where it is admired as a masterpiece of ancient art.

Art, as we now understand it, is the work of individual creativity, made to be displayed and admired for its own sake. The codex was not created primarily to be admired as art. It was created to proclaim authority. Yet an object’s purpose does not exclude its beauty, nor does it keep us from appreciating it on our own terms. Like the codex, objects found at the Copalita archaeological site are often beautiful, and knowing what they were made to do can enhance our appreciation of them.

The Axe-money Stone

The axe-money stone is one such object, and its location, the site’s ball court, is significant. Every Mesoamerican town of any consequence had a ball court, and this one had its court by about AD 600. It shows the town was a civic and religious centre, sharing the same ritual world as great cities such as Monte Albán.

Axe money, represented on a carved stone in the ball court, was a form of currency made of flat, thin pieces of copper shaped like small, stylized axes. People often used the pieces to pay tribute. Archaeologists have found them bundled in burial sites, suggesting they represented not only wealth but also symbolic or ceremonial value in the afterlife.

Why the axe-money symbol was carved in the ball court is unknown. It could declare prosperity, or even indicate that the ball court hosted high-level, elite competitions in which axe money was wagered or awarded as a prize. Whatever the reason, like the codex, the stone was not made to be admired as art. It had a job to do.

Clay Figurines

On the hillside above the Copalita River, archaeologists have uncovered household compounds dating back more than 2,000 years. At the time, homes were not the private refuges we think of today, nor were the objects found there decorative art. Among the finds were many clay figurines, nearly all of them women, and most were broken.

Examples of similar clay figurines from the same era, found in central Mexico, are now in the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s collection in New York. We see them today as art, but that was not their original purpose.

Each figurine was hand-shaped, so no two are alike, and each was small enough to fit in the palm. This craft tradition lasted for centuries. Archaeologists have found them in homes and graves, suggesting a ceremonial role, perhaps tied to fertility or daily rituals, though exactly how they were used remains unknown.

Although their original purpose was not art, their stylized depictions of the human form are themselves artistic. The anthropologist Ellen Dissanayake calls this impulse “making special”: making something ordinary extraordinary. It may be where creativity and art begin. The broken figurines found in ordinary homes on the hillside above the Copalita River testify to that artistic impulse.

What the Codex tells us

For the ancient inhabitants of Copalita, appearing in the Codex Zouche-Nuttall was no honour. It shows that Copalita was conquered and owed tribute (and it makes no mention of the beach). But the fact that Copalita was represented in some way speaks to something fundamental in Art: Representation.

Take, for example, the conqueror himself, 8 Deer Jaguar Claw. His illustration was not an attempt at realistic portraiture, but a representation of his name and his power. For centuries, the codex’s representations have served multiple purposes. Art is only the latest.

The Codex Zouche-Nuttall is an eleven-metre strip of deerskin coated in white plaster, folded like an accordion into 47 panels, painted on both sides. One side is dedicated to the founding and ruling families of several Mixtec kingdoms. The other side is devoted to 8 Deer’s biography, conquests, and rank as king. Taken together, it functions like a title deed for his kingdom and a claim to legitimacy for his descendants.

One panel in particular shows the ceremony in which 8 Deer received a turquoise nose ornament, a symbol of Toltec royal authority. These are representations within representations: the ornament represents royal authority, the codex represents 8 Deer receiving it, and the British Museum now represents the codex as Art.

The three objects discussed here tell us something about this ancient place at the mouth of the Copalita River, and something about Art. For the people who lived here, these objects and the images on them were familiar, and they carried meanings everyone understood. The artisans who made them put their time, care and attention into making them as beautiful as they could. Centuries later, those meanings have faded, but the care remains. The makers gave these objects their beauty, a gift for all time. We gave them the name Art.

Randy Jackson blends local reporting from the perspective of a seasonal Huatulco resident with explorations of life and change in Huatulco, Oaxaca, and Mexico. Email: box95jackson@gmail.com

 

First Morning in Huatulco: The Map, The Mirror and The Mind

By Randy Jackson—

Beyond a certain age, it becomes strikingly clear how much our memories define who we are, or who we think we are. What we remember, whether true or false, ends up defining us. Memory is a complex and fascinating faculty, and understanding even a few of its features helps us better understand how we make sense of the world.

If you can imagine awakening from a deep blackout sleep, one in which your brain needs to reboot, you would have three profound questions: Where am I? Who am I? And who (the hell) are you? At that moment, you really need your memory to perform three different functions. These three functions are handled differently with varying degrees of accuracy and reliability within your cranial complex. These are: Geographical Memory to know where you are. Autobiographical Memory to recall who you are. And Facial Memory to recognize others.

Geographical Memory

As a seasonal resident, sometimes waking on the first morning in Huatulco results in a brief but sudden shift in orientation. That felt shift seems to be the result of my brain recognizing the familiar bedroom surroundings of our place in Huatulco, while realizing I’m not in Calgary anymore. And although I’m sure no neurologist would ever describe it this way, it seems like the geographical memory snapped into place.

In fact, our geographical memory function is one of the oldest and most developed in evolutionary terms. Well before we had language ability and could formulate abstract thought, we could remember where we were. John O’Keefe, a brain researcher, discovered, in the 1970s, what he called “place cells”: brain cells that fired only when an animal stood in one particular place, and nowhere else. In 2014, this work won the Nobel Prize after further discoveries showed that brain cells formed a hexagonal map of any space we move through. So who knew, that first-morning surprise awakening in Huatulco is backed by solid brain science.

The capacity of our geographical memory is perhaps best demonstrated by research on London cab drivers. What cabbies call ‘The Knowledge’ requires them to memorize an extraordinary amount about London’s notoriously complex network of roads, place names and landmarks. I can vouch for this ability. Once (before Google Maps), after getting off at the wrong underground stop and being hopelessly lost, we took a bus to who-knows-where, hoping to find a place to catch a cab. Then, getting off at a random bus stop, we found a London cab that recognized the street name our hotel was on. Saved by the enlarged hippocampus of a taxi driver. Brain scans have shown that London cabbies have a larger-than-normal area of the brain most tied to spatial memory.

Autobiographical Memory

That impressive ability of humans, and no doubt other animals, to know where we are does not translate so well to remembering who we are. Autobiographical memory is notoriously poor, or perhaps better said: “flexible”. But “flexible” enough to clearly remember things that never happened.

Often cited as an important “where were you when” example is the account of people remembering where they were when they first heard that John F Kennedy was assassinated. It’s a term psychologists call Flashbulb Memory. The idea is that the emotional impact of hearing of a tragic event cements the details of where they were when they heard the news. But when psychologists have actually tested such memories, they’ve found otherwise.

The day after the Challenger Space Shuttle disaster, in January 1986, researchers asked a group of students to write down where they were and what they were doing when they heard the news. Three years later, they asked the same students again. The students were confident in their memories, but often those later memories were wrong. Even when shown their own handwritten account from the day after, some refused to believe it, trusting their most vivid current memory over the document in their own hands.

Getting some details wrong about a past event is one thing. Remembering a whole event that never happened is something else. This may be best demonstrated by a 1995 study titled “Lost in the Mall.” Researchers first interviewed each subject’s family members to gather three real events from that person’s childhood. Then they presented those three, along with a fourth, a made-up story about being lost in a mall as a child but rescued unharmed by a kind stranger.

Over two interviews, they asked what the subjects remembered about each event. By the second interview, about a quarter of them not only “recalled” the mall incident that never happened but had begun to furnish it with details of their own, such as what the kind rescuer was wearing.

And if getting details wrong over time and remembering things that never happened aren’t bad enough, another fly in the ointment of autobiographical memory is how our brains reconstruct our memories. It is a misconception to think our brains are like computer memory, where the data stored is the same data recalled. Rather, each time we recall an event, we rebuild it, filling gaps from previous versions and coloring the result with the mood and circumstances of the moment. Then this revised version of the memory is stored until the next recall, creating a slow drift over time.

Facial Memory

As unreliable as our autobiographical memory can be, we are very good at remembering other people — not their names, of course, or even where we might have seen them before, but in recognizing the face itself. In fact, some people show exceptional skill in this ability.

At the time of the London riots in 2011, Constable Gary Collins of the London Metropolitan Police was on vacation. Recognizing some of the faces in the television news coverage, he returned to work to help identify rioters in the grainy CCTV footage. Collins identified around 180 suspects from riot imagery. The Met’s facial-recognition software of the time identified just one. His unusual ability helped prompt the Met to establish a dedicated super-recognizer unit, built on the small number of people who possess a supersized portion of our ability to recognize faces.

The three questions I opened with: Where am I? Who am I? Who are you? are each answered by a different memory faculty. Our sense of identity leans on all their answers. To demonstrate the importance of these memory functions, we might look to an example of someone who can no longer answer any of the three correctly.

In the essay ‘A Matter of Identity’, neurologist Oliver Sacks describes a patient of his, William Thompson, who has Korsakoff’s syndrome (the alcohol-related memory collapse). When Thompson was alone, out in the home’s garden, he sat quietly. But the moment another person appeared, a face he could not place, the confabulation ignited. He would take the stranger for someone he knew, then improvise a time and place to fit, often articulate, often interesting, a whole new identity assembled on the spot.

Thankfully, unlike Thompson, we do not invent a new self for every stranger we meet. Perhaps the brief disorientation we sometimes feel on waking is a reminder that our sense of self depends not on memory being perfectly accurate, but on it being flexible enough to bend without breaking—and still carry one continuous self from one day into the next.

Randy Jackson blends local reporting from the perspective of a seasonal Huatulco resident with explorations of life and change in Huatulco, Oaxaca, and Mexico. Email: box95jackson@gmail.com

 

Un Nuevo Amanecer It takes a village to raise a child

by Anita McDermott and Alyson Vinish—

Thirty years ago, a small group of determined people climbed into a VW Beetle and began traveling from village to village around Santa María Huatulco. They were looking for families whose children had physical or developmental disabilities — children who, at the time, had few local resources available to them.

Flor Angélica Castillo de la Cruz, María Estela Venegas Aguirre, Dominga Sánchez Aguirre, Luz María Blanquet and Leonardo Alcántara García recognized the need and decided to do something about it. Their work would eventually become Un Nuevo Amanecer en Pro del Discapacitado (UNA), which celebrated its 30th anniversary in 2025.

In those early days, the group conducted needs assessments throughout the municipality of Santa María Huatulco. Traveling to remote communities, they met with families to better understand their circumstances and to talk about the importance of care and support for children with physical and developmental disabilities.

UNA’s initial funding came from the Ba’asolay Foundation. Piña Palmera, another organization working with people with disabilities on the Oaxacan coast, provided medical assistance, wheelchairs and hearing aids in collaboration with the Rotary Club of Huatulco.
Over the years, UNA developed partnerships with government institutions, international organizations and local supporters. Volunteers also became an important part of the organization’s growth.

For 27 years, UNA operated from space generously provided inside Ferrealianza Hardware store. Then, in 2023, it moved into its new Child Care Centre in Huatulco — a considerable change from those early journeys in a VW Beetle.

Today, UNA serves approximately 180 children each year from 28 communities. Families come not only from Huatulco, but also from neighboring municipalities and communities including San Miguel del Puerto, Pochutla, Río Grande and San Pedro Huamelula.

The children range in age from infants to teenagers and receive services according to their individual needs. These include speech therapy, occupational therapy, physiotherapy, sign-language instruction and educational support, provided by qualified full-time therapists.
But the work is also about what comes next.

UNA’s goal is to help children participate as fully as possible in their families, schools and communities and, as they grow older, in the workplace. For young people who may not continue with formal education, workshops teach practical skills such as cooking and independent living, helping prepare them for adulthood.

Thirty years after a handful of people began traveling through the villages surrounding Huatulco, the need for that work remains. According to UNA, approximately 70 percent of the families it serves live in poverty. The organization relies heavily on donors, volunteers and community support to cover the cost of therapies, programs and staff.

What has changed is the scale of what those first volunteers began. The VW Beetle has given way to a dedicated center, and a small group trying to identify children who needed help has become an organization serving families across the region.

But the idea at its heart remains much the same: caring for a child is rarely the work of one person alone.

How You Can Help

Through UNA’s Sponsor a Child (Apadrina a un Niño) program, donors can help cover a child’s therapeutic treatment. A donation of $15,000 pesos provides therapeutic support for one year, with the program focusing particularly on children who require multiple therapies and whose families need financial assistance.

Canadian donors can make tax-deductible contributions through Amistad Canada. When donating, select the Un Nuevo Amanecer project and indicate whether your contribution is to sponsor a child or support UNA’s general operating costs.
http://www.amistadcanada.org

UNA also raises funds through annual community events, including Blues at Bocana, with food, drinks and live entertainment, and Vamos Huatulco, a 3 km walk and 5 km run.

For more information about UNA, including stories from some of the families it has supported, visit:
http://www.unnuevoamanecerhux.com

Alyson Vinish and Anita McDermott serve as project liaisons between UNA and Amistad Canada.

What Huatulco Remembers: The Lavariega Family Before FONATUR

By Bianca Corona—

There is a version of Huatulco that now exists mostly in memory. Before the paved streets. Before the hotels. Before boundaries were drawn across maps and land was divided by paperwork. Before anyone imagined what this coastline would look like forty years into the future.

There are few photographs from that time. Most fishing families did not have cameras to capture ordinary life by the sea. What remains lives in stories. In names. In the memory of where a river once deepened, where animals grazed freely, and where families gathered when the moon was full.

I asked Abdon Lavariega Arista and his sister Oliva what Huatulco looked like before FONATUR arrived. Not the official version. Not the hectares or the decrees, although those came too, unprompted, because Abdon carries dates the way some people carry scripture. I asked them what they remembered.

Santa Cruz is where their family’s memory runs deepest, so that is where much of this story lives. But the same transformation, with its own local details, unfolded across this entire stretch of coast. In Bajos de Coyula. In Bajos del Arenal. On ranches near Tangolunda and along the Copalita River. This is Huatulco’s story, told through one family’s corner of it.

Before the Order

“Antes de la expropiación había libertad,” Abdon told me. Before the expropriation, there was freedom.

The land was communal, and that freedom was not an abstract idea. It was physical. You could camp on any beach or open plain, and nobody stopped you. Cattle, goats, pigs, and pack animals moved freely across the hillsides. The hills themselves looked different then. They were sabanas. Open. Grassy. Almost without trees because the animals kept them that way. Today, Abdon points out, grazing is restricted, and those same hills have grown into something closer to forest. It is one of the unexpected contradictions of development.

Santa María Huatulco, the municipal seat, moved according to its own rhythm. Monday was market day. Residents from the surrounding rancherías arrived on donkeys and mules to buy produce and dry goods at what is still known as the mercado antiguo, across from the old Palacio Municipal. Abdon remembers the shopkeepers by name: Don Antonio Salinas Gutiérrez, Doña Hortencia Martínez, Don Polo Galán. The way you remember the people who fed your family.

There were no restaurants. There were fondas. Small, informal kitchens where people sat together after finishing their shopping. Fishing required no permits. There was no capitanía de puerto watching the water. What you caught, you sold to your neighbors.

Oliva’s childhood followed a slightly different rhythm. She grew up mostly on the family ranch, Piedra de Moros, and came to Santa Cruz with her parents during visits until she was around twelve. She remembers dirt streets. No pavement anywhere. And one great spectacle: a traveling fair that arrived in Santa Cruz on the first Friday of the month. Against a village that small, the rides must have looked enormous.

She also carries stories of teenagers playing on the beach beneath the full moon. Those memories originally belonged to her sister-in-law, who lived them directly, but Oliva tells them now. Because that is how memory moves through a family. Hand to hand. Voice to voice. Until it becomes difficult to know exactly where one person’s memory ends and another begins.

When the News Arrived

Abdon remembers hearing news of the development project over the radio near the end of José López Portillo’s presidency. The official expropriation came during the presidency of Miguel de la Madrid. The decree was signed on May 28, 1984, and published in the Diario Oficial de la Federación the following day.

But for Oliva, the beginning was not about documents. It was a feeling. “Era como una emoción,” she said. It felt like excitement.

Huatulco was going to grow. More people would arrive. There would be jobs and opportunities, and they were told the project would benefit the comuneros. Huatulco would become like Cancún. Nobody she knew was preparing for loss. They were preparing for a future that sounded, for a moment, as though it belonged to them.

What It Took

What that future required arrived slowly, and not evenly. The agency behind that decree was FONATUR, the Fondo Nacional de Fomento al Turismo. It was created in 1974, folding together two earlier federal tourism funds, with a specific job: acquire undeveloped coastline, draw a master plan across it, build the roads and the utilities, then sell the serviced lots to hotel investors and developers. Huatulco was one of five major Centros Integralmente Planeados, large-scale tourism destinations developed according to federal master plans, alongside Cancún, Ixtapa, Los Cabos, and Loreto. Cancún came first, in the early 1970s, and became the template everything after it was measured against. Huatulco followed roughly a decade later, when a 1984 federal expropriation transformed nearly 21,000 hectares of communal territory into the land base for a new planned tourism destination.

Oliva remembers the noise of the dársena being built near her family’s home. The house was part concrete block and part varitas, sticks and cane. She remembers watching the beaches change. “Se empezó a ver mucha gente extraña, muchos albañiles.” There were strangers. Construction workers. People arriving everywhere, all at once.

And she remembers what she misses most. “Las playas vírgenes, las playas solas.” The untouched beaches. The empty beaches.

For Abdon, the greatest loss was not a single beach or piece of land. It was movement itself. “Éramos libres de caminar, cruzar los ríos y pescar,” he said. They were free to walk. To cross the rivers. To fish. To let an animal wander without encountering a fence, a permit, or an invisible boundary drawn somewhere on a map. It was an entire way of moving through a landscape that had once seemed to answer to no one.

Abdon also spoke about the unease of suddenly living among people whose histories nobody in Santa Cruz knew. “Gente extraña que no sabemos qué antecedentes traen.” Strangers whose backgrounds were unknown. It is not an easy observation, but it reveals something about what rapid growth can do to a small community. Development does not only bring new people. It changes the quiet structure a village may not realize it depends on until it is gone, the fact that everyone knows everyone.

What It Gave

Abdon is careful not to tell only one side of the story. The development brought employment closer to home. It brought money into the region and exposed many families to a world beyond the coast. Some families recognized the opportunity and built rooms to rent. Roads and infrastructure improved.

Education came closer too. His children, and the generations after them, could attend COBAO and universities without making the same journey he had made. Abdon had to leave home to study. Secondary school in Salina Cruz. High school in Oaxaca City. A childhood shaped by migration simply to receive an education.

“Así es como se sufrió antes,” he said. That was how people suffered before. He does not say this to erase what was lost. He says it because no story is only one thing. Growth took. Growth gave. And sometimes the same family carries gratitude and grief at once.

What Only Memory Keeps

Some of what disappeared cannot be measured in hectares. It is texture. Rhythm. The feeling of a place before anyone thought to document it.

Abdon remembers full-moon nights when he played a las escondidas and el encantado. Games that continued until the children made their way to the river to swim in the honduras, the deep pools carved into the riverbed by years of moving water.

He listed the fruit as though he could still taste it: chía, cachayumba, papaya, piñuela, nanche de sabana, coconut, watermelon, cucumber. “Todo era natural.” Everything was natural. Everything simply grew.

He remembers Día de Muertos too. Not as a celebration performed for visitors, but as something intimate. Tamales from November 1 through November 2. Neighbors inviting one another inside for bread and chocolate. A village briefly becoming one household to receive its dead.

“Huatulco antes se veía como una familia. Todos éramos conocidos.” Before, Huatulco felt like a family. Everyone knew everyone.

Oliva remembers a deep communal well where people went to wash clothing and collect water before pipes reached their homes. She only visited it a few times herself. By the time her life settled in Santa Cruz, that world had already begun to change. It sounds like a small detail, but a communal well is never only a source of water. It is where a village speaks to itself.

What I Keep Asking

On a personal note, and as someone who came after the fact, this story has its own thread running through my own family. My father arrived in Huatulco years before any of this had a name most people recognized, and bought land here early, a quiet bet that this coast was going somewhere. My mother arrived differently. She had been working in Cancún, selling tours from the hotels there, when a major hurricane tore through the city and her coworkers began talking about a new tourism boom farther south, in Huatulco. She followed the work. In 1994, she and my father met at the Sheraton, the hotel that is now the Barceló. I exist, in a literal sense, because tourism brought two strangers to the same stretch of beach.

I did not grow up here. I grew up returning here, and there is something full-circle about that. The same tourism industry this piece keeps circling back to—the one that transformed Huatulco—is also the reason my own family has a story here at all. But there is a difference between benefiting from what came afterward and having lived through what the Lavariegas experienced, and I try to remain aware of it.

I cannot pretend to know what it felt like for the Lavariega family or others like them to watch an open hillside become part of someone else’s map. Or to exchange a communal well for a metered municipal line. Or to learn that a place they had always crossed freely now required permission.

What I can do is listen and sit with the final thing Abdon told me, because it has continued to follow me. He spoke about the fees now connected to accessing and using protected coastal areas and the feeling that local people are asked to pay without seeing anything returned to them. “Sin tener nada a cambio,” he said. Without receiving anything in return.

Land becomes claimed through a map somewhere. A boundary drawn in an office. Sometimes, he says, without even a mojonera, a physical marker on the ground showing the people who live there where one territory ends and another begins. “Se adjudica ser propietario de territorios que ni siquiera dan la identidad del trazo.” Someone claims ownership of territory without clearly identifying the boundary itself.

I work in real estate on this coast. I sell the version of Huatulco that comes with a survey, a fideicomiso, a notary, and a clean paper trail. It is, in almost every way, the opposite of an open plain that once belonged to whoever needed it that season. I cannot pretend that does not place me somewhere inside this story. Not only reporting on it, but living inside its contradiction.

And the institution that began much of this transformation is changing too. Beginning in 2024, responsibility for much of the CIP’s infrastructure and public services—including water, sanitation, waste collection and routine urban maintenance —shifted from FONATUR to the State of Oaxaca and local authorities.

The question is not whether Huatulco should have grown. It did. It is. It will continue to. The question is who gets to hold the paper now, and whether growth, more than forty years later, still owes something to the people whose land it grew from.

 

Do You Remember Huatulco When…?

That was the question we put to readers on Facebook. We asked them to name something they remembered that no longer exists, and more than 400 comments followed. Together, they recalled an earlier map of Huatulco: bus stops beneath trees, dances where markets now stand, favorite places to eat, and the little train that circled the park.

“La Crucecita didn’t exist yet. The Adolfo López Mateos primary school stood where the Santa Cruz dock is now. There was only one taxi, and people traveled in passenger trucks.”— Fabiola

“Where Plaza Madero stands, the micros used to stop beneath a huge tree. U2 was mostly dirt, with just a few improvised houses.”— Alika

“I remember the guanacaste tree where Plaza Madero is now.”— Carolina

“The boulevard to Santa Cruz ended at the far end of Sector F.”— Harriet

“There was no parking or bathroom at Playa El Arrocito. You reached the beach by a steep path.”
— Pedro

“Before Magic Circus, we went dancing at a place across from the park that everyone called La Nacoteca. Workers from the hotels and the construction sites met there. It was beautiful, and we had such a good time.”— Sharin

“The fairs were set up in La Crucecita’s park, and the Independence Day celebrations took place at the sports court. The dancing and festivities happened right in the center.”— Lety

“La Tropicana was open around the clock. Upstairs was El Telefonito, where Doña Naty made the best chocolate milkshake.” — Calacas

“I remember sitting on those lovely benches with backs, eating a paleta from La Zamora after dinner at Pollo Chava or Don Arnoldo’s Fogón. Paradise.”— Socorro

“The little train—and the Barbie motorcycles and Jeeps you could rent in the park. I remember them from as far back as I can remember.”— Kyara

“Música por la Tierra!” — Estefanía

“There was a place where you could rent a movie and watch it in a little wooden room.”— Miguel

“I used Mare’s dial-up internet and went to its cybercafé above the shops behind Súper Santa Cruz.”— Raúl

“The first cinema was where the Megacable offices are now.”— Jesús

“There were no traffic lights, and there was just one policeman.” — Ritu

“La Fuente, Café Dublín, the internet cafés—and the iguana at the bar in Los Portales.”— Karen

“Santa Cruz had only Ve el Mar and Doña Celia. The church was just a palapa.”— Julie

“Doña Celia’s first palapa; her son Migue with the first Jet Ski in Huatulco; and Don Wilo’s pizzas on Cocotillo.”— Rubén

“The pizzas sold from a tricycle at the entrance to Residencial Chahué were delicious.” — Bernardo

Some places have changed names. Others have disappeared so completely that a comment was enough to make someone else say, I remember that too.

What do you remember?

Write to us at TheEyeMexico@gmail.com

Reader comments translated and lightly edited for length.

 

When Did Huatulco Stop Being Cheap?

By Randy Redmon and Jesse Kirkham—

There was a time when one of the great pleasures of living in or visiting Huatulco was sitting down at a nice restaurant, ordering a good meal, having a couple of drinks and walking away from the table thinking, “Wow, that was a lot of food for very little money.”

Huatulco was never completely free of expensive restaurants, of course, but for many Canadians and Americans, the appeal was that even a good restaurant meal generally felt like a bargain compared with what they were accustomed to paying at home.

Lately, however, we’ve found ourselves looking at restaurant bills a little differently, not necessarily because the prices are outrageous, but because the gap between what we used to think of as “cheap” and what we are paying today seems to be getting smaller. Perhaps the easiest way to see that change is with a glass of wine.

Consider a restaurant selling a house wine for 150 pesos a glass. Depending on the exchange rate, that works out to roughly C$12 or US$9. Neither figure is particularly shocking when compared with a mid-range restaurant in Canada or the United States, especially when you remember that Canadian restaurant prices often have sales tax added after the menu price.

The question, then, isn’t really whether 150 pesos is expensive, but whether it still feels like the kind of value people have traditionally associated with Huatulco.

For many years, the favourable exchange rate helped make Huatulco feel exceptionally inexpensive to Canadians and Americans. A 300-peso dinner seemed like a bargain when your dollar bought a significant number of pesos. With the peso stronger against both the Canadian and U.S. dollars, those same peso prices translate into noticeably more money from a foreign visitor’s perspective.

A 1,000-peso restaurant bill is still 1,000 pesos, but it is also roughly C$81 or US$59 at today’s exchange rates. Add a bottle of wine, a couple of cocktails, dessert and a tip, and a dinner for two can reach 1,500 pesos or more without anyone feeling as though they went overboard.

That doesn’t necessarily make Huatulco expensive, particularly when a comparable dinner in Canada, the United States or Europe can easily cost more. It does, however, mean that Huatulco may not feel as incredibly cheap to a Canadian or American visitor as it once did.

Visitors adjust accordingly. A family staying in an Airbnb may make breakfast and lunch themselves and eat out less often, while a couple might buy a bottle of wine at the supermarket rather than order several glasses at dinner. Someone heading to the beach may fill a cooler rather than buying drinks and snacks throughout the day. Those choices make perfect financial sense, but collectively they can also affect the local businesses that depend on visitor spending.

This is where the conversation becomes more interesting than simply asking whether Huatulco restaurants are too expensive. The real question may be what value means to us now.

Huatulco has changed considerably over the years, and the restaurant scene is better and more diverse than it was when many of us first arrived. There are talented chefs, excellent seafood, international cuisine, interesting wine lists and restaurants offering experiences that simply weren’t available here years ago. That improvement comes with a price, and most of us understand that, but customers are also doing their own calculations.

If I spend 1,200 or 1,500 pesos on dinner, I don’t necessarily need it to be cheap; I need it to feel worthwhile. I want good food, good service, a pleasant atmosphere and, yes, a glass of wine that makes me glad I ordered it. That is really the difference between cheap and value: cheap is about price, while value is about what you get for the price.

Perhaps Huatulco is slowly making that transition. For years, one of the easiest ways to market a Mexican vacation was to say, “It’s beautiful, the weather is fantastic, and everything is cheap,” but perhaps that isn’t the best way to describe Huatulco anymore.

Huatulco may be becoming a value destination rather than a cheap destination, and that’s not necessarily a bad thing. People will pay for quality, a memorable meal, good service and a beautiful setting when they feel that what they received was worth what they paid.

Huatulco’s appeal has never really been that everything is cheap. It has always been the combination of natural beauty, climate, culture, food, hospitality and a quality of life that offered exceptional value. Perhaps that’s what we should be protecting.

So the next time you sit down at a Huatulco restaurant and look at a 150-peso glass of wine, maybe the question isn’t whether it’s expensive, but something much simpler: Is it worth it?

Editor’s Letter

By Jane Bauer—

You pile up associations the way you pile up bricks. Memory itself is a form of architecture.
-Louise Bourgeois

Who would you be without your memories? Without the ideas you have collected about yourself, about others and the world around you? I have thought a lot about this in the last couple of years as I cared for my mother who was shedding her memories the way a tree loses its leaves when winter is coming. At first there was a panic as to what would happen, what would be left and how would we cope if we got to the point where I was a stranger.

Of course there was a resistance, a desire to hold on to every moment and remembrance, but that resistance itself was a form of disease built by fear and the unknown. Eventually the path we chose was acceptance and the world around us loosened, tension slackened and we made space for new things. My mother never forgot who I was but sometimes she didn’t know that I was her daughter, I was maybe a sister or a friend or even her mother. I, in turn, had to release my resistance to the idea of her as my mother. Whoever she thought I was, I wanted her to associate me with love and safety and I let that dictate my reaction to each situation we faced.

She saw the environment around us with new eyes each day and she took me along for the ride. Without the clutter of the past we would marvel at the new green shoots of leaves on a plant or the rising of the moon. How miraculous to see the rising of the moon as though for the first time!

Our memories can be tools. They can transport us to a moment in time in the past and we can feel the texture of an object we haven’t held for years or conjure up the smell of our childhood bedroom. Our memories can also be weapons. Some people hold on to grudges like they are precious riches. Our memories can also be unreliable. Women who experience childbirth often say in the moment they will never do it again only to do it again once the pain has passed and they are holding a newborn in their arms.

And perhaps memory reaches beyond what we consciously remember. Like the complex networks beneath forests, where trees exchange resources and information through their roots and fungal partners, we too are connected to what came before us. Scientists are exploring whether some effects of our ancestors’ experiences may be carried through epigenetic mechanisms – chemical changes that affect how genes are expressed without changing the DNA sequence itself. In animals, there is compelling evidence that some of these effects can cross generations; in humans, the science is still unfolding. What we inherit may be more complicated than the stories we have been told.
None of us is an island.

This month our writers explore memory in many different forms. Thank you for reading.

See you next month,

Jane